Community Notice · Unofficial Hendricks Co., Indiana

License plate readers are tracking every car in this county.

108 cameras. Six police agencies. Zero state rules on how long your location data is kept or who it's shared with. Here's what's documented — and what you can do during the National Week of Action, Aug 16–22.

National Week of Action Against ALPRs
Aug 16–22, 2026
Council meetings in all four
towns this month — see dates

Note: No town has ALPRs on a posted agenda yet, and public-comment rules vary — check the agenda when it posts (~1 week out) and confirm with the clerk whether general comment is open.

The short version 30 seconds

These cameras photograph every passing car — not just suspects — and log plate, location, and time in a searchable database. Indiana sets no limits on retention, sharing, or oversight, so every safeguard is voluntary and can change without notice. The ask is simple: end the contracts, or bind them with real rules.

What to ask for in order of preference

  1. Don't renew the contract. Bloomington did exactly this in March. The county functioned before these cameras; it will function after.
  2. Failing that: binding, public rules. A council-adopted use policy (not a vendor webpage), independent audits of search logs, and a public answer on whether local data feeds Flock's nationwide search network.
  3. At minimum: no quiet renewals. Cost, term, camera count, and retention discussed in the open — not passed as a line item.

Pick one thing any one helps

  1. 01
    Show up. A full room changes the conversation. You don't have to say a word.
  2. 02
    Speak (2–3 min). The three asks above are a ready outline. Sign-up is usually a sheet at the door.
  3. 03
    File a records request. Any person can request a town's Flock contract, payments, and use policy — residency not required (IC 5-14-3).
  4. 04
    Map a camera. See one that's not on deflock.me? Drop a pin. That's where the 108 count comes from.
  5. 05
    Email your state legislators. Indiana's zero-rules status is the root problem. Eyes Off Indiana has the policy goals ready.
  6. 06
    Share this page. That's the whole ask.

August council meetings

These are regular monthly meetings — ALPRs are not confirmed on any agenda, and whether open public comment is allowed varies by town. Check the posted agenda and confirm with the clerk before making the drive.

3 cameras Danville Wed Aug 19 · 7 PM Town Hall, 49 N. Wayne St.
1st & 3rd Wednesdays — the Aug 19 meeting falls during the week of action
20 cameras Brownsburg Thu Aug 13 & Aug 27 · 7 PM 61 N. Green St.
2nd & 4th Thursdays — just before & just after the week
26 cameras Avon Thu Aug 13 & Aug 27 · 7 PM Town Hall, 6570 E US Hwy 36
2nd & 4th Thursdays (work session 5:30 PM Aug 13)
22 cameras Plainfield Mon Aug 10 & Aug 24 · 7 PM Civic Center Council Chambers, 206 W. Main St.
2nd & 4th Mondays

The numbers crowdsourced · refreshed nightly

108cameras countywide
#8of 92 IN counties
6police agencies
3,222cameras statewide
1.1M+plate reads/mo — 2 of 6 agencies reporting
0state rules on retention, sharing, or oversight
TownCamerasPer 100k
Avon26105.1
Plainfield2258.2
Brownsburg2059.8
Pittsboro5116.6
Danville323.9
Lizton2394.5

What Flock publishes about local use

Flock hosts "transparency portals" for at least four local agencies. They're real and worth reading — but they're vendor-hosted, hard to find, and were surfaced by volunteers, not linked by the agencies themselves.

AgencyCamerasReads / 30dHotlist hitsHit rate
Sheriff's Office19783,54954,414~7%
Avon PD6344,18048,128~14%
Plainfield PD
Pittsboro PD

Plainfield's portal is notable for a different reason: it discloses a long list of outside organizations with access to its data — the one question the other portals don't answer.

The portals state
  • Plates & vehicles only — no facial recognition
  • Law-enforcement use only; never sold
  • Immigration enforcement prohibited
  • 30-day retention; access logs kept indefinitely
The open questions
  • Roughly 1 in every 7–14 passing cars is flagged as a "hit." How many were false positives — and how many led to a stop?
  • Plainfield publishes its sharing list. Will the others?
  • Who reviews the access logs — has anyone, ever?
  • Were any of these policies adopted by a council, or do they exist only on Flock's site?

"Never sold" is likely true — and beside the point. The concern is sharing: one query through Flock's law-enforcement network can reach tens of thousands of cameras nationwide, under the querying agency's rules, not ours. No money needs to change hands for that.

An hour away, this already worked

Bloomington ended its Flock contract in March 2026.

After months of public pressure, the city let its ~$50,000 contract expire on March 5 and declined to renew. Even before that, it had barred out-of-state agencies from querying its database; afterward, it cut all outside data sharing.

The mayor's own words are the tone worth borrowing: if a tool like this is used at all, it must be under narrow parameters, strong accountability, and clear public safeguards.

The paper trail documents, found & pending

DocumentTown / AgencyStatus
Flock contract (5-year)AvonPublic — council agenda packet
Staff pricing memoAvonPublic — $2,500 → $3,000/camera/yr
Contract, payments, use policyBrownsburgRequested — pending
Contract, payments, use policyDanvilleRequested — pending
Contract, payments, use policyPlainfieldNot yet requested

Requests filed under Indiana's Access to Public Records Act. Responses will be linked here as they arrive.

Sources